Nothing has been changed in a funny way about the photos, so it doesn’t become a parody either. Dutch example: Low maintenance Maintenance poverty is a well-known account that collects images about the “ragging” of the Netherlands. You mainly see photos of gardens with grass and plants giving way to tiles. The content comes from everywhere, like Facebook. Again, little is added to context. Because sometimes the screenshot shows who originally published.
If people turn out
You could say that sometimes the name is still mentioned here. But just mentioning the name is not enough for a quote. In addition, nothing funny is changed or added to make it a parody. In some cases, in Chile WhatsApp Number List addition to copyright as a problem, you could even say that there is a violation of a good name. Most photos are not commented on in a very friendly way.
Because it is of course
That sometimes goes beyond the limits of freedom of expression. Dutch example: HEMA HEMA has an account where they publish their own content as well as customer content. I noticed that with user generated content they at least mention the name of the maker. I couldn’t figure out how they got this content. In any case, their bio doesn’t say they are appropriating content when a certain hashtag is used.